![]() Pain Mangement Journals
|
JLME Volume 29: 1, 2001 Read the full articles of this issue here in Acrobat (.pdf) format Symposium Articles Introduction: Relieving Unnecessary, Treatable
Pain for the Sake of Human Dignity The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias Against Women
in the Treatment of Pain In general, women report more severe levels of pain, more frequent incidences of pain, and pain of longer duration than men, but are nonetheless treated for pain less aggressively. The authors investigate this paradox from two perspectives: Do men and women in fact experience pain differently whether biologically, cognitively, and/or emotionally? And regardless of the answer, what accounts for the differences in the pain treatment they receive, and what can we do to correct this situation? Pain Management and Provider Liability: No
More Excuses The author confronts the fact that pain is undertreated at all levels of the American health-care system and investigates how the threat of malpractice may change this state of affairs. Specifically, the author analyzes existing and emerging liability theories and doctrines that may be used to motivate physicians, hospitals, nursing homes, and managed care organizations with regard to the particular standard of care they owe to the patient to properly treat pain. Race, Ethnicity, and Pain Treatment: Striving
to Understand the Causes and Solutions to the Disparities in Pain Treatment Racial and ethnic minorities are at higher risk for the ineffective treatment of pain. While others have investigated racial and ethnic disparities in access to health services generally, this article represents the first comprehensive review of the literature on racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of pain. In addition to conducting this review, the author also outlines some of the causes for the disparities as well as provides suggestions for future health-services research in this area. From Confrontation to Collaboration: Collegial
Accountability and the Expanding Role of Pharmacists in the Management of
Chronic Pain The war on drugs has created an environment where both physicians and pharmacists are afraid to aggressively manage pain which, for many patients, means horrific unrelieved suffering. Although the policy-on-paper, as the author calls it, regarding controlled substances has eased, the policy-in-practice has not, and physicians and pharmacists are still fearful of prosecution or other disciplinary action. As a solution, the author proposes and discusses in detail collaborative drug therapy management for chronic pain. Ethics Commentary and Court Decisions Currents in Contemporary Ethics The author reviews in detail two federal training requirements for those engaging in human subjects research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Public Health Service (PHS). The author concludes that neither the interim NIH educational policy nor the PHS draft instruction policy goes far enough to properly ensuring the safety of human subjects or the integrity of the underlying research. Recent Developments in Health Law
|
|
Copyright | Terms of use | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Home Copyright © 2004. ASLME. All Rights Reserved. |